Table 1: Comparison of survivors

NCL @ CSHA1

Not Demented @ CSHA2 (459)

Demented @ CSHA2 (79)

p

Age

76.9 ± 6.5

82.1 ± 5.8

<.001

% Female

62.5

69.6

.23

3MS score

83.1 ± 10.3

76.8 ± 9.5

<.001

Education (Years)

9.7 ± 4.1

8.6 ± 3.6

.02

Family history of dementia

16.4%

16.0%

.93

Informant reports memory problems

25.3%

40.0%

.008

ADL status1

2.5 ± .73

2.8 ± .95

.005

CIND @ CSHA1

Not Demented @ CSHA2 (193)

Demented @ CSHA2 (161)

p

Age

77.1 ± 7.0

80.5 ± 6.9

<.001

% Female

60.1

70.8

.04

3MS score

73.4 ± 14.3

66.5 ± 13.7

<.001

Education (Years)

8.1 ± 3.7

7.9 ± 3.7

.57

Family history of dementia

19.3%

25.0%

.23

Informant reports memory problems

49.2%

67.1%

.001

ADL status

2.8 ± 1.1

3.2 ± .99

.004

1OARS derived ADL scores ranged from 2 (excellent/good function) to 6 (total impairment)